Breedlove v. Suttles
Read the full opinion on CourtListener · The case as printed (Library of Congress)
Overruled
- Overruled by Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections (1966)suggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), Table of Supreme Court Decisions Overruled by Subsequent Decisions, p. 2444: Harper v. Virgina Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966) — Breedlove v. Suttles, 302 U.S. 277 (1937).
Syllabus
The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. It is shown as printed in the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan (optical character recognition in older volumes, not yet checked word by word against the page).
1. A Georgia statute exempts all persons under 21 or over 60 years of age, and all females who do not register for voting, from a poll tax of $1.00 per year, which is levied generally upon all inhabitants, and which, under the state constitution, must be paid by the person liable, together with arrears, before he can be registered for voting. Held that males who are not within the exemption are not denied the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. Pp. 281-282.
Printed on p. 277 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
2. On the basis of special consideration to which they are naturally entitled, women ad a class may be exempted from poll taxes without exempting men. P. 282.
Printed on p. 278 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
3. Since this discrimination is permissibie in favor of all women, a man subject to the tax has no status to complain that, among women, the tax is levied only on those who register to vote, or that registration is allowed to them without paying taxes for previous years. P. 282.
Printed on p. 278 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
4. Payment of the Georgia poll tax as a prerequisite to voting is not required for the purpose of denying or abridging the privilege of voting. P. 282.
Printed on p. 278 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
5. Exaction of payment of poll taxes before registration as an aid to collection is a use of tht State's power consistent with the Federal Constitution. P. 283.
Printed on p. 278 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
6. Voting is. a privilege derived not from the United States but from the State, which may impose such conditions as it' deems appropriate, subject only to the limitations of the Fifteenth and Nineteenth Amendments and other provisions of the Federal Constitution. P. 283.
Printed on p. 278 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
7. A state law requiring payment of poll taxes as a condition to voting does not abridge any privilege or immunity protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. P. 283.
Printed on p. 278 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
8. The Nineteenth Amendment, forbidding denial or abridgement of the right to vote, on account of sex, applies equally in favor of men and women, and by its own force supersedes inconsistent measures, whether federal or state. P. 283.
Printed on p. 278 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
9. It was not the purpose of the Nineteenth Amendment to limit the taxing power of the State. P. 283.
Printed on p. 278 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
10. The Georgia statute levying on 'inhabitants of the State. a poll tax, payment whereof is made a prerequisite to voting, but exempting females who do not register for voting, does not abridge the right of male citizens to vote, on account of their sex, and is not repugnant to the Nineteenth Amendment. P. 284.
Printed on p. 278 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
183 Ga. .189; 188 S. E. 140, affirmed.
Printed on p. 278 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
Provisions
The Constitution Annotated's essays on these provisions cite this case.
- Amendment XIV, Section 1suggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), essays Amdt14.S1.2.2, Amdt14.S1.3, Amdt14.S1.8.6.2, pp. 2070, 2253.
Why it is here
The library's first set of cases is chosen by fixed rules from the Constitution Annotated (2022), which cites this case as “Breedlove v. Suttles, 302 U.S. 277 (1937)”:
- overruled (table of overruled decisions) and cited on 5 pages