United States v. Classic
Read the full opinion on CourtListener · The case as printed (Library of Congress)
Syllabus
The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. It is shown as printed in the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan (optical character recognition in older volumes, not yet checked word by word against the page).
1. Review under the Criminal Appeals Act of a judgment sustaining a demurrer to an indictment is confined to the questions of statutory construction and validity decided by the District Court. P. 309.
Printed on p. 299 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
2. In Louisiana, a primary election to nominate a party candidate for the office of Representative in Congress is conducted at the public expense and regulated by statute. Candidates who may be voted for at general elections are restricted to primary nominees; to persons, not candidates in the primary, who file nomination papers with the requisite number of signatures; and to persons whose names may be lawfully written into the ballots by the electors. The practical effect is to impose serious restrictions upon the choice of candidates by the voters save by voting at the primary election. The primary election is an integral part of the procedure for choosing Representatives; and in this case, as alleged by the indictment, its practical operation, in the particular Congressional District involved, is to secure the election of the primary nominee of a particular political party. P. 311 et seq.
Printed on p. 299 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
3. The right of the people to choose Representatives in Congress is a right established and guaranteed by Art. I, § 2 of the Constitution and hence is one secured by it to those citizens and inhabitants of the State who are entitled to exercise the right. P. 314.
Printed on p. 299 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
The right to vote for Representatives in Congress is a right "derived from the States," only in the sense that the States are authorized by the Constitution to legislate on the subject, as provided by § 2 of Art. I, to the extent that Congress has not restricted state action by the exercise of its powers to regulate elections under § 4, and its more general power, under Art. I, § 8, cl. 18, "to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers."
Printed on p. 299 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
4. Included within the right to choose, secured by the Constitution, is the right ol qualified voters within a State to cast their ballots and have them counted at Congressional elections. P. 315.
Printed on p. 299 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
Since the constitutional command is without restriction or limitation, this right, unlike those guaranteed by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, is secured against the action of individuals as well as of States.
Printed on p. 299 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
5. Where the state law has made the primary election an integral part of the procedure of choosing Representatives, or where in fact the primary effectively controls the choice, the right of the qualified elector to vote and have his ballot counted at the primary, is part of the right to choose Representatives secured by Art. I, § 2. P. 316.
Printed on p. 300 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
In determining whether a provision of the Constitution applies to a new subject matter, it is of little significance that it is one with which the framers were not familiar. For in setting up an enduring framework of government they undertook to carry out for the indefinite future and in all the vicissitudes of the changing affairs of men, those fundamental purposes which the instrument itself discloses. Hence we read its words, not as we read legislative codes which are subject to continuous revision with the changing course of events, but as the revelation of the great purposes which were intended to be achieved by the Constitution as a continuing instrument of government.
Printed on p. 300 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
6. A primary election which is a necessary step in the choice of candidates for election as Representatives in Congress, and which in the circumstances of the case controls that choice, is an election within the meaning of Art. I, §§ 2 and 4 of the Constitution, and is subject to Congressional regulation as to the manner of holding it. P. 317.
Printed on p. 300 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
7. Art. I, § 8, cl. 18 of the Constitution empowers Congress to safeguard by appropriate legislation the right of choice by the people of Representatives in Congress secured by § 2 of Art. I. P. 320.
Printed on p. 300 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
8. Section 19 of the Criminal Code, making it a crime to conspire to "injure" or "oppress" any citizen "in the free exercise of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution," embraces a conspiracy to prevent qualified voters from exercising their constitutional right of voting, and having their votes counted, in a primary election prerequisite to the choice of party candidates for a Congressional election. P. 321.
Printed on p. 300 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
9. Section 20 of the Criminal Code provides that whoever, "under color of any law," willfully subjects any inhabitant of any State to the deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States "or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such inhabitant being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens," shall be punished as prescribed. Held:
Printed on p. 300 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
(1) The acts of election officials who conducted a primary election to nominate a party candidate for Representative in Congress in willfully altering and falsely counting and certifying the ballots, were acts under color of state law depriving the voter of constitutional rights within the meaning of the section. P. 325.
Printed on p. 301 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
(2) The section authorizes punishment for two different offenses: The offense of willfully subjecting any inhabitant to the deprivation of rights secured by the Constitution, and the offense of willfully subjecting any inhabitant to different punishments on account of his alienage, color or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens. P. 327.
Printed on p. 301 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
10. The Court declines to consider the application of § 20 to deprivations of the right to equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, a point apparently raised for the first time by the Government's brief in this Court and not assigned as error. Since the indictment on its face does not purport to charge a deprivation of equal protection to voters or candidates, the Court is not called upon to construe the indictment in order to raise a question of statutory validity or construction. P. 329.
Printed on p. 301 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
35 F. Supp. 66, reversed.
Printed on p. 301 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
Provisions
The Constitution Annotated's essays on these provisions cite this case.
- Amendment XIVsuggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), essays Amdt14.2, pp. 2055, 2056.
- Amendment XIV, Section 5suggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), essays Amdt14.S5.1, Amdt14.S5.2, pp. 2313, 2315.
- Article I, Section 2, Clause 2suggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), essays ArtI.S2.C2.1, ArtI.S2.C2.2, pp. 195, 198.
- Article I, Section 4, Clause 1suggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), essays ArtI.S4.C1.2, ArtI.S4.C1.3, pp. 243, 247, 248.
Why it is here
The library's first set of cases is chosen by fixed rules from the Constitution Annotated (2022), which cites this case as “United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 (1941)”:
- cited on 12 pages