United States ex rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy
Read the full opinion on CourtListener · The case as printed (Library of Congress)
Syllabus
The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. It is shown as printed in the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan (optical character recognition in older volumes, not yet checked word by word against the page).
The alien wife of a citizen who had served honorably in the armed forces of the United States during World War II sought admission to the United States. On the basis of confidential information the disclosure of which, in his judgment, would endanger the public security, the Attorney General denied a hearing, found that her admission would be prejudicial to the interests of the United States, and ordered her excluded. Held: This action was authorized by the Act of June 21, 1941, 22 U. S. C. § 223, and the proclamations and regulations issued thereunder, notwithstanding the War Brides Act of December 28, 1945, 8 U. S. C. § 232 et seq. Pp. 539-547.
Printed on p. 537 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
(a) The admission of aliens to this country is not a right but a privilege, which is granted only upon such terms as the United States prescribes. P. 542.
Printed on p. 537 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
(b) The Act of June 21, 1941, did not unconstitutionally delegate legislative power to prescribe the conditions under which aliens should be excluded. Pp. 542-543.
Printed on p. 537 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
(c) It is not within the province of any court, unless expressly authorized by law, to review the determination of the political branch of the Government to exclude a given alien. P. 543.
Printed on p. 537 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
(d) Any procedure authorized by Congress for the exclusion of aliens is due process, so far as an alien denied entry is concerned. P. 544.
Printed on p. 538 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
(e) The regulations governing the entry of aliens into the United States during the national emergency proclaimed May 27, 1941, which were prescribed by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 2523, were "reasonable" within the meaning of the Act of June 21, 1941. P. 544.
Printed on p. 538 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
(f) Presidential Proclamation 2523 authorized the Attorney General as well as the Secretary of State to order the exclusion of aliens. P. 544.
Printed on p. 538 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
(g) Petitioner, an alien, had no vested right of entry which could be the subject of a prohibition against retroactive operation of regulations affecting her status. P. 544.
Printed on p. 538 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
(h) The national emergency proclaimed May 27, 1941, has not been terminated; a state of war still exists; and the Act of June 21, 1941, and the proclamations and regulations thereunder are still in force. Pp. 545-546.
Printed on p. 538 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
(i) A different result is not required by the War Brides Act, which waives some of the usual requirements for the admission of certain alien spouses only if they are "otherwise admissible under the immigration laws." Pp. 546-547.
Printed on p. 538 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
173 F. 2d 599, affirmed.
Printed on p. 538 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
Provisions
The Constitution Annotated's essays on these provisions cite this case.
- Amendment Vsuggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), essays Amdt5.6.2.2, pp. 1747, 1748.
- Article I, Section 8, Clause 18suggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), essays ArtI.S8.C18.7.10, ArtI.S8.C18.8, ArtI.S8.C18.8.1, ArtI.S8.C18.8.6, ArtI.S8.C18.8.7, ArtI.S8.C18.8.7.1, ArtI.S8.C18.8.7.2, ArtI.S8.C18.8.7.3, ArtI.S8.C18.8.8.1, ArtI.S8.C18.8.8.2, ArtI.S8.C18.8.8.5, pp. 508, 516, 518, 520, 525.
Why it is here
The library's first set of cases is chosen by fixed rules from the Constitution Annotated (2022), which cites this case as “United States ex rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy, 338 U.S. 537 (1950)”:
- most cited in essay topic ArtI.S8.C18.8 (5 pages)