1. Library
  2. Cases
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania
Supreme Court of the United States

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey

505 U.S. 833Decided June 29, 1992Overruled

Read the full opinion on CourtListener · The case as printed (Library of Congress)

Overruled

Syllabus

The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. It is shown as printed in the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan (optical character recognition in older volumes, not yet checked word by word against the page).

1: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, syllabus ¶ 1 (Case.112786.syllabus.1)

At issue are five provisions of the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982: § 3205, which requires that a woman seeking an abortion give her informed consent prior to the procedure, and specifies that she be provided with certain information at least 24 hours before the abortion is performed; § 3206, which mandates the informed consent of one parent for a minor to obtain an abortion, but provides a judicial bypass procedure; § 3209, which commands that, unless certain exceptions apply, a married woman seeking an abortion must sign a statement indicating that she has notified her husband; § 3203, which defines a "medical emergency" that will excuse compliance with the foregoing requirements; and §§3207(b), 3214(a), and 3214(f), which impose certain reporting requirements on facilities providing abortion services. Before any of the provisions took effect, the petitioners, five abortion clinics and a physician representing himself and a class of doctors who provide abortion services, brought this suit seeking a declaratory judgment that each of the provisions was unconstitutional on its face, as well as injunctive relief. The District Court held all the provisions unconstitutional and permanently enjoined their enforcement. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part, striking down the husband notification provision but upholding the others.

2: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, syllabus ¶ 2 (Case.112786.syllabus.2)

Held: The judgment in No. 91-902 is affirmed; the judgment in No. 91-744 is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case is remanded.

3: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, syllabus ¶ 3 (Case.112786.syllabus.3)

947 F. 2d 682: No. 91-902, affirmed; No. 91-744, affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Provisions

The Constitution Annotated's essays on these provisions cite this case.

Why it is here

The library's first set of cases is chosen by fixed rules from the Constitution Annotated (2022), which cites this case as “Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)”:

  • overruled by Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (table of overruled decisions)
  • overruled (table of overruled decisions) and cited on 6 pages

How cases are chosen and imported

Connections graph

Enter all results↑ ↓ then Enter to open oneTry “Federalist 51”, “Article I, Section 8”, “Amendment 14”

Where you've been

    The places you have read, newest first, kept in this browser only. Nothing is sent anywhere.