United States v. E.C. Knight
Read the full opinion on CourtListener · The case as printed (Library of Congress)
Syllabus
The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. It is shown as printed in the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan (optical character recognition in older volumes, not yet checked word by word against the page).
The monopoly and restraint denounced by the act of July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209, "to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies," are a monopoly in interstate and international trade or commerce, and not a monopoly in the manufacture of a necessary of life.
Printed on p. 1 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
The American Sugar Refining Company, a corporation existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, being in control of a large ma3ority of the manufactories of refined sugar in the United States, acquired, through the purchase of stock in four Philadelphia refineries, such disposition over those manufactories throughout the United States as gave it a practical monopoly of the business. Held, that the result of the transaction was the creation of a monopoly in the manufacture of a necessary of life, which could not be suppressed under the provisions of the act of July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209, " to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies," in the mode attempted in this suit; and that the acquisition of Philadelphia refineries by a New Jersey corporation, and the business of sugar refining in Pennsylvania, bear no direct relation to commerce between the States or with foreign nations.
Printed on p. 1 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
Provisions
The Constitution Annotated's essays on these provisions cite this case.
- Article I, Section 8, Clause 3suggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), essays ArtI.S8.C3.2, ArtI.S8.C3.4, ArtI.S8.C3.5, ArtI.S8.C3.5.1, ArtI.S8.C3.5.10, ArtI.S8.C3.5.11, ArtI.S8.C3.5.2, ArtI.S8.C3.5.3, pp. 325, 328, 329, 330, 331, 340.
Why it is here
The library's first set of cases is chosen by fixed rules from the Constitution Annotated (2022), which cites this case as “United States v. E.C. Knight, 156 U.S. 1 (1895)”:
- most cited in essay topic ArtI.S8.C3.5 (5 pages)