Graves v. New York ex rel. O’Keefe
Read the full opinion on CourtListener · The case as printed (Library of Congress)
Syllabus
The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. It is shown as printed in the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan (optical character recognition in older volumes, not yet checked word by word against the page).
1. The receipt of salary by a resident of New York as an examining attorney for the Federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation, is constitutionally subject to non-discriminatory taxation by a State. P. 475. '
Printed on p. 466 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
2. For the purposes of this case it is assumed that the creation of the Home Owners' Loan Corporation was a constitutional exercise of the powers of the FRderal Government, and that all activities of the Government constitutionally authorized by Congress are governmental and stand on a parity with i,'spect to immunity from state-taxation. P. 477.
Printed on p. 466 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
3. Whether Congress, as an incident to the exercise of specifically granted powers, has power to grant tax exemptions extending beyond the constitutional immunity of federal agencies which courts may imply, is a question not determined in this case. P. 478.
Printed on p. 466 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
4. No purpose of Congress either to grant or to withhold immunity from state taxation of salaries of employees of the Home Owners' Loan Corporation is expressed or implied in the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933, 48 Stat. 128, or is to be inferred from the silence of Congress.. P. 479.
Printed on p. 467 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
5. A tax on income is not legally or economically a tax on its source, and there isno basis for the assumption that' the economic burden of a non-discriminatory state income tax on the salary of an employee of the National Oovernment or of a governmental agefcy is passed on so as to impose a burden on the National Government tantamount to an unconstitutional interference by the one government with the other in the performance of its functions. P. 480.
Printed on p. 467 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
6. Assuming that the Homd Owners' Loan Corporation is clothed with the same constitutional immunity from state taxation as the Government itself, it can not be said that the present tax on the income of its employees lays any unconstitutional burden upon it.' P. 486.
Printed on p. 467 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
7. Collector v. Day; 11 Wall. 113, and New York ex rel. Rogers v. Graves, 299 U. S. 401, are overruled in so far as they recognize an implied constitutional immunity from non-discriminating income taxation of the salaries of officers or employees of the national or state governments or their instrumentalities. Id.
Printed on p. 467 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
278 N. Y. 691; 16 N. E. 2d 404, reversed.
Printed on p. 467 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
Provisions
The Constitution Annotated's essays on these provisions cite this case.
- Amendment Xsuggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), essays Amdt10.3, Amdt10.3.1, Amdt10.3.5, Amdt10.4, Amdt10.4.1, pp. 1974, 1979.
- Article I, Section 8, Clause 1suggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), essays ArtI.S8.C1.1.2, ArtI.S8.C1.1.5, pp. 303, 310, 311, 312.
Overrules
- New York ex rel. Rogers v. Graves (1937)suggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), Table of Supreme Court Decisions Overruled by Subsequent Decisions, p. 2448: Graves v. New York ex rel. O’Keefe, 306 U.S. 466 (1939) — New York ex rel. Rogers v. Graves, 299 U.S. 401 (1937).
- Collector v. Day (1871)suggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), Table of Supreme Court Decisions Overruled by Subsequent Decisions, p. 2448: Graves v. New York ex rel. O’Keefe, 306 U.S. 466 (1939) — Collector v. Day, 78 U.S. (11 Wall.) 113 (1871).
Why it is here
The library's first set of cases is chosen by fixed rules from the Constitution Annotated (2022), which cites this case as “Graves v. New York ex rel. O’Keefe, 306 U.S. 466 (1939)”:
- most cited in essay topic ArtI.S8.C1.1 (4 pages)