1. Library
  2. Cases
  3. Perez
Supreme Court of the United States

Perez v. Brownell

356 U.S. 44Decided March 31, 1958Overruled

Read the full opinion on CourtListener · The case as printed (Library of Congress)

Overruled

Syllabus

The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. It is shown as printed in the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan (optical character recognition in older volumes, not yet checked word by word against the page).

1: Perez v. Brownell, syllabus ¶ 1 (Case.105658.syllabus.1)

In proceedings to deport a person born in the United States, the Government denied that he was an American citizen on the ground that, by voting in a Mexican political election and remaining outside of the United States in wartime to avoid military service, he had lost his citizenship under § 401 (e) and (j) of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended. He sued for a judgment declaring him to be a citizen but was denied relief. Held: It was within the authority of Congress, under its power to regulate the relations of the United States with foreign countries, to provide in § 401 (e) that anyone who votes in a foreign political election shall lose his American citizenship; and the judgment is affirmed. Pp. 45-62.

2: Perez v. Brownell, syllabus ¶ 2 (Case.105658.syllabus.2)

(a) The power of Congress to regulate foreign relations may reasonably be deemed to include a power to deal'with voting by American citizens in foreign political elections, since Congress could find that such activities, because they might give rise to serious international embarrassment, relate to the conduct of foreign relations. Pp. 57-60.

3: Perez v. Brownell, syllabus ¶ 3 (Case.105658.syllabus.3)

(b) Since -withdrawal of the citizenship of Americans who vote in foreign political elections is reasonably calculated to effect the avoidance of embarrassment- in the conduct of foreign relations, such withdrawal is within the power of Congress, acting under the Necessary and Proper Clause. Pp. 60-62.

4: Perez v. Brownell, syllabus ¶ 4 (Case.105658.syllabus.4)

(c) There is nothing in the language, the context, the history or the manifest purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment to warrant drawing from it a restriction upon the power otherwise l'ossessed by Congress to withdraw citizenship. P. 58, n. 3.

5: Perez v. Brownell, syllabus ¶ 5 (Case.105658.syllabus.5)

(d) No opinion is expressed with respect to the constitutionality of § 401 (j) relating to persons who remain outside the United States to avoid military service. P. 62.

Provisions

The Constitution Annotated's essays on these provisions cite this case.

Why it is here

The library's first set of cases is chosen by fixed rules from the Constitution Annotated (2022), which cites this case as “Perez v. Brownell, 356 U.S. 44 (1958)”:

  • overruled by Afroyim v. Rusk (table of overruled decisions)
  • overruled (table of overruled decisions) and cited on 5 pages

How cases are chosen and imported

Connections graph

Enter all results↑ ↓ then Enter to open oneTry “Federalist 51”, “Article I, Section 8”, “Amendment 14”

Where you've been

    The places you have read, newest first, kept in this browser only. Nothing is sent anywhere.