Afroyim v. Rusk
Read the full opinion on CourtListener · The case as printed (Library of Congress)
Syllabus
The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. It is shown as printed in the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan (optical character recognition in older volumes, not yet checked word by word against the page).
Petitioner, of Polish birth, became a naturalized American citizen in 1926. He went to Israel in 1950 and in 1951 voted in an Israeli legislative election. The State Department subsequently refused to renew his passport, maintaining that petitioner had lost his citizenship by virtue of § 401 (e) of the Nationality Act of 1940 which provides that a United States citizen shall "lose" his citizenship if he votes in a foreign political election. Petitioner then brought this declaratory judgment action alleging the unconstitutionality of § 401 (e). On the basis of Perez v. Brownell, 356 U. S. 44, the District Court and Court of Appeals held that Congress under its implied power to regulate foreign affairs can strip an American citizen of his citizenship. Held: Congress has no power under the Constitution to divest a person of his United States citizenship absent his voluntary renunciation thereof. Perez v. Brownell, supra, overruled. Pp. 256-268.
Printed on p. 253 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
(a) Congress has no express power under the Constitution to strip a person of citizenship, and no such power can be sustained as an implied attribute of sovereignty, as was recognized by Congress before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment; and a mature and well-considered dictum in Osborn v. Bank of the United States, 9 Wheat. 738, 827, is to the same effect. Pp. 257-261.
Printed on p. 253 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
(b) The Fourteenth Amendment's provision that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States . . . are citizens of the United States . . ." completely controls the status of citizenship and prevents the cancellation of petitioner's citizenship. Pp. 262-268.
Printed on p. 253 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
361 F. 2d 102, reversed.
Printed on p. 253 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
Provisions
The Constitution Annotated's essays on these provisions cite this case.
- Amendment XIV, Section 1suggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), essays Amdt14.S1.1.2, Amdt14.S1.1.3, Amdt14.S1.2, Amdt14.S1.2.1, pp. 2066, 2067.
- Article I, Section 8, Clause 4suggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), essays ArtI.S8.C4.1.1, ArtI.S8.C4.1.4.2, ArtI.S8.C4.1.6, ArtI.S8.C4.1.6.1, ArtI.S8.C4.1.6.2, ArtI.S8.C4.1.6.3, ArtI.S8.C4.1.6.4, ArtI.S8.C4.1.6.5, pp. 389, 399, 409, 410, 412, 413, 415.
Overrules
- Perez v. Brownell (1958)suggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), Table of Supreme Court Decisions Overruled by Subsequent Decisions, p. 2444: Afroyim v. Rusk, 387 U.S. 253 (1967) — Perez v. Brownell, 356 U.S. 44 (1958).
Why it is here
The library's first set of cases is chosen by fixed rules from the Constitution Annotated (2022), which cites this case as “Afroyim v. Rusk, 387 U.S. 253 (1967)”:
- most cited in essay topic ArtI.S8.C4.1 (7 pages)