National League of Cities v. Usery
Read the full opinion on CourtListener · The case as printed (Library of Congress)
Overruled
- Overruled by Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (1985)suggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), Table of Supreme Court Decisions Overruled by Subsequent Decisions, p. 2440: Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. 528 (1985) — National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 833 (1976).
Syllabus
The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. It is shown as printed in the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan (optical character recognition in older volumes, not yet checked word by word against the page).
The Fair Labor Standards Act was amended in 1974 so as to extend the Act's minimum wage and maximum hour provisions to almost all employees of States and their political subdivisions. Appellants (including a number of cities and States) in these cases brought an action against appellee Secretary of Labor challenging the validity of these 1974 amendments and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. A three-judge District Court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief might be granted. Held:
Printed on p. 833 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
1. Insofar as the 1974 amendments operate directly to displace the States' abilities to structure employer-employee relationships in areas of traditional governmental functions, such as fire prevention, police protection, sanitation, public health, and parks and recreation, they are not within the authority granted Congress by the Commerce Clause. In attempting to exercise its Commerce Clause power to prescribe minimum wages and maximum hours to be paid by the States in their sovereign capacities, Congress has sought to wield its power in a fashion that would impair the States' "ability to function effectively in a federal system," Fry v. United States, 421 U. S. 542, 547 n. 7, and this exercise of congressional authority does not comport with the federal system of government embodied in the Constitution. Pp. 840-852.
Printed on p. 833 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
2. Congress may not exercise its power to regulate commerce so as to force directly upon the States its choices as to how essential decisions regarding the conduct of integral governmental functions are to be made. Fry v. United States, supra, distinguished; Maryland v. Wirtz, 392 U. S. 183, overruled. Pp. 852- 855.
Printed on p. 833 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
406 F. Supp. 826, reversed and remanded.
Printed on p. 833 of the United States Reports, read from the text layer of the Library of Congress scan. View the page image
Provisions
The Constitution Annotated's essays on these provisions cite this case.
- Amendment Xsuggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), essays Amdt10.1, Amdt10.2, Amdt10.3.4, Amdt10.4.2, pp. 1972, 1977, 1978, 1981.
- Article I, Section 8, Clause 3suggested link
Source: Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation (2022 ed.), essays ArtI.S8.C3.5.10, ArtI.S8.C3.5.11, ArtI.S8.C3.6, ArtI.S8.C3.6.1, ArtI.S8.C3.6.2, pp. 340, 341.
Why it is here
The library's first set of cases is chosen by fixed rules from the Constitution Annotated (2022), which cites this case as “National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 833 (1976)”:
- overruled by Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (table of overruled decisions)
- overruled (table of overruled decisions) and cited on 9 pages