Debates in the Senate on the Eighteenth Amendment, 1917

July 12, 1917

NATIONAL PROHIBITION.2 min read
1: Senate, July 12, 1917, ¶ 1 (Senate1917.Jul12.1)

Mr. SHEPPARD. I ask unanimous consent for the present consideration of the joint resolution (S. J. Res. 17) proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

2: Senate, July 12, 1917, ¶ 2 (Senate1917.Jul12.2)

The VICE PRESIDENT . . Is there objection?

3: Senate, July 12, 1917, ¶ 3 (Senate1917.Jul12.3)

Mr. PENROSE. Mr. President; I have just returned to the Chamber. What is the request of the Senator from Texas?

4: Senate, July 12, 1917, ¶ 4 (Senate1917.Jul12.4)

l\lr. SHEPPARD. · I have asked unanimous consent to take up the Senate joint resolution providing for Nation-wide prohibition, with a view of determining whether a date might not be agreed upon for a vote.

5: Senate, July 12, 1917, ¶ 5 (Senate1917.Jul12.5)

l\lr. PENROSE. Does tile Senator expect a vote on the joint any progress is being made? resolution this morning?

6: Senate, July 12, 1917, ¶ 6 (Senate1917.Jul12.6)

l\lr. SHEPPARD. I do not, but l: wish to see if we can not agree on a date for a vote . at some future time. .

7: Senate, July 12, 1917, ¶ 7 (Senate1917.Jul12.7)

Mr. PENROSE. Does the Senator want to discuss the joint re .j; olutiol1 this morning?

9: Senate, July 12, 1917, ¶ 9 (Senate1917.Jul12.9)

l\lr. PENROSE. As I understand, the joint resolution is simply brought up with the desire of the Senator to have a unanimousconsent e nt agreement as to a date to vote on the measure?

11: Senate, July 12, 1917, ¶ 11 (Senate1917.Jul12.11)

l\lr. PENROSE. Well, 1\lr. President, I do not know but that tbe Senator from Texas may be able to obtain that agreement a little later, but I do not think he can do so this morning. We have one unanimous agreement now, and I do not think there are very many precedents for piling up unanimous-consent agreements. Later on, when the pending bill is disposed of, I w ; mt to assure the Senator that, so far as I am personally concerned, I shall not have any very strong disposition to create any permanent obstacle in the way of disposing of this measure, but I can not c!onsent to it this morning. ·

12: Senate, July 12, 1917, ¶ 12 (Senate1917.Jul12.12)

Mr. SHEPPARD. Very well, 1\Ir. President.

13: Senate, July 12, 1917, ¶ 13 (Senate1917.Jul12.13)

l\Ir. SHAFROTH. Would the Senator from Pennsylvania object to making this joint resolution the special order for a night session? - - l\Ir. PENROSE. 1\Ir. President, I do not think we have reached a point where we need to have a night session. We are all working very hard, and many of us are working overtime.

14: Senate, July 12, 1917, ¶ 14 (Senate1917.Jul12.14)

l\11". SHAFROTH. I do not believe there will be any lengthy di s cussion upon it. For that reason we could dispose of it in one or two ev-ening sessions. .

15: Senate, July 12, 1917, ¶ 15 (Senate1917.Jul12.15)

Mr. PENROSE. I do not think there will be · any very long di sc ussion on the joint resolution, but I think there will be some very serious· discussion of it.

16: Senate, July 12, 1917, ¶ 16 (Senate1917.Jul12.16)

l\lr. SHEPPARD. In view of the statements of the Senator from Pennsylvania, I withdraw my request for the present.

Connections graph

Enter all results↑ ↓ then Enter to open oneTry “Federalist 51”, “Article I, Section 8”, “Amendment 14”

Where you've been

    The places you have read, newest first, kept in this browser only. Nothing is sent anywhere.