Debates in the House of Representatives on the Fifteenth Amendment, 1869

January 27, 1869 (2)

suffbaqh.3 min read
1: House, January 27, 1869 (2), ¶ 1 (House1869.Jan27b.1)

The SPEAKER. The House now resumes the consideration of the motion of the gentleman from Massachusetts [Mr. Boutwell] to reconsider the vote by which the bill (H. R. No. 1067) to secure equal privileges and immunities to citizens of the United States, and to enforce the provisions of article fourteen of the amendments to the Constitution, and the joint resolution (H. R. No. 402) proposingan amendment to the Constitution of the United States, were recommitted to the Committee on the Judiciary. The subject was postponed until er the morning hour of to day and upon it the gentleman from Illinois, [Mr. Cui lom is entitled to the floor.

2: House, January 27, 1869 (2), ¶ 2 (House1869.Jan27b.2)

Mr. CULLOM. The gentleman from Wisconsin, [Mr. Ei driucb who is a member of the Committee on the Judiciary, desires to address the House to day upon this subject, as the: e will be important bu iness before that committee ta morrow I have consented to yield him now the hour tq which I am entitled if I can be allowed to take the Saqr agaiu immediately after he shall have concluded his r6ni3irksi*

3: House, January 27, 1869 (2), ¶ 3 (House1869.Jan27b.3)

Mr. BOUTWELL. I wish to make a suggestion to the House. I desire to ask unanimous consent that after the close of the remarks of the gentleman from Wisconsin [Mr. Eldkidge] the farther consideration of this subject shall be postponed until to morrow evening, 'which I understand will be satisfactory to the gentleman from Illinois, [Mr. Cullom J Tomorrow evening let the debate be confined to this subject, and then, if I understand the rule s of the House, if the adjournment shall take place while this subject shall be under consideration, it will come up oil Friday morning immediately after the reading of the Journal. That will give the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Washbur e an opportunity to press the consideration of the appropriation bills to day and to morrow

4: House, January 27, 1869 (2), ¶ 4 (House1869.Jan27b.4)

The SPEAKER. If this subject shall be postponed until to morrow evening, and then comes up on Friday morning as unfinished business, it will not be till after the expiration of the morning hour, as that will be private bill day, unless the House shall by vote set aside the morning hour of that day.

5: House, January 27, 1869 (2), ¶ 5 (House1869.Jan27b.5)

Mr. DAWES. I do not desire to interfere with the business of the House, but I wish to state that there are four election cases undisposed of which it is not only proper but important to have brought up before the House at a very early day, and I do not feel it my duty to permit unanimous consent to any arrangement of our business unless the House will also, by unanimous consent, assign some time for the consideration of these cases.

6: House, January 27, 1869 (2), ¶ 6 (House1869.Jan27b.6)

The SPEAKER. The Chair will state that immediately after the reading of the Journal on any morning, when there is not unfinished business coming over from the preceding day, privileged reports or motions to reconsider may be called up before the morning hour begins.

7: House, January 27, 1869 (2), ¶ 7 (House1869.Jan27b.7)

Mr. DAWES. I am aware of that; but I have watched very faithfully for such an opportunity, and it has not arisen very lately.

8: House, January 27, 1869 (2), ¶ 8 (House1869.Jan27b.8)

The SPEAKER. That is owing to the fact that on several days recently there has been unfinished business coming over from the day preceding. The question is now on the motion of the gentleman from Massachusetts, [Mr. Boutwell,] that at the conclusion of the remarks of the gentleman from Wisconsin [Mr. Eldridge] the further consideration of the motion to reconsider be postponed till tomorrow evening, when debate only shall be in order, the question going over till Friday morning.

9: House, January 27, 1869 (2), ¶ 9 (House1869.Jan27b.9)

On the motion there were—ayes 05, noes 24; no quorum voting.

10: House, January 27, 1869 (2), ¶ 10 (House1869.Jan27b.10)

The SPEAKER, under the rule, ordered tellers; and appointed Mr. BotrnvEixand Mr. Brooks.

11: House, January 27, 1869 (2), ¶ 11 (House1869.Jan27b.11)

The House divided; and the tellers reported—ayes eighty one noes not counted.

Connections graph

Enter all results↑ ↓ then Enter to open oneTry “Federalist 51”, “Article I, Section 8”, “Amendment 14”

Where you've been

    The places you have read, newest first, kept in this browser only. Nothing is sent anywhere.