Debates in the House of Representatives on the Twelfth Amendment, 1803

October 27, 1803

AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION.2 min read
1: House, October 27, 1803, ¶ 1 (House1803.Oct27b.1)

Mr. J. Clay, after observing on the proceedings of yesterday in respect lo the future mode of election of President and Vice President, said he should move an amendment to strike out the word three, and insert the word five.

2: House, October 27, 1803, ¶ 2 (House1803.Oct27b.2)

Mr. Dawson said that a motion, in substance, to the same purpose, had been presented to the House yesterday, and rejected. He felt no anxiety whether the House, in case of equal votes for Presidentand Vice President, was confined to three or five ; but it was his wish that the least alteration possible should be made in the Constitution, as first framed. Under this consideration, the insertion of the word three was. in his opinion, the least of ihe'alierations proposed. He though! that making the choice out oijiee, was guarding against what might perhaps never happen. He should, however, feel little difficulty in voting for either.

4: House, October 27, 1803, ¶ 4 (House1803.Oct27b.4)

sary to take up the time of the Coroiniilee, Thi gentleman who moved the amendment tells us thatjfife is the least deviation. He could not agree to this, ll did not in the least affect tlie choice of a Vice President.

5: House, October 27, 1803, ¶ 5 (House1803.Oct27b.5)

Mr. SMtLiE considered it a duty due to himself to assert that his sentiments throug-h the whole of this business were uniform. He thought that he could discern that the Chairman was surprised at the deviation from the original opinion of some gentlemen. His present sentiments he had declared before the select committee, and to these he still adhered. He said he would vote in any way, so that an opinion might be had j and the less they deviated, the safer they were. He had no object in view but the public good. He was extremely tenacious in altering the Constitution, but, wittionl the spirit of accommodation, they could never agree upon a number. If one gentleman, 10 1 i dulge himself, persisted in the number three, others oSfize, he knew not when an opinion could be obtained.

6: House, October 27, 1803, ¶ 6 (House1803.Oct27b.6)

Mr. Elliot said that he would engross the attention of the Committee but a moment, and he would not ask for that moment if he did not think that what he had to offer would facilitate an accommodation. Some gentlemen, he observed, were so tenacious of the number beinf_;ipe, that, unless they were indulged, they would never make an amendment. He would therefore vote for that number, in order to promote his desired accommodation.

7: House, October 27, 1803, ¶ 7 (House1803.Oct27b.7)

The question was taken for inserting the word >Spe— ayes59, noes 47.

8: House, October 27, 1803, ¶ 8 (House1803.Oct27b.8)

On motion, the Committee rose, and the Sfeakeb resumed the Chair, when the question was again put and carried. Itwas then move: that the amendments be engrossed, and that a third reading be had to-day. Agreed to.

Connections graph

Enter all results↑ ↓ then Enter to open oneTry “Federalist 51”, “Article I, Section 8”, “Amendment 14”

Where you've been

    The places you have read, newest first, kept in this browser only. Nothing is sent anywhere.